يسجل

Vocking BV's Climate Report

Submitted on 2026-08-28  ·  Edited on 2026-08-28

Introduction *

1.1 End day of the reporting period*

2025-12-31

1.1.1 Reporting year*

2025

1.2 Describe your business activities*

We have been producing Vocking liver sausage according to a traditional family recipe since 1891. Sales channels are retail, catering and wholesalers. We also produce (liver) sausage varieties under private label.

1.4 Number of employees on the end day of the reporting period*

4

1.4.1 Full-time equivalent (FTE) or headcounts*

Full-time equivalent

1.5 Is this report being submitted on behalf of a parent company or a subsidiary? If so, please briefly explain the relationship.*

Parent company

1.5.1 Please explain the relationship*

-

Commitment and Targets *

2.1 Net zero target year*

2045

2.1.1 Base year*

2024

2.1.2 Base year value*

41228

Base year value confirmation*

I confirm that I have entered my base year value in metric tons CO2e

2.2 Near-term target*

5% of intensity scope 1+2+3 emission reduction from my base year by 2026

2.3 Provide any additional comments or context on your net zero and near term targets.*

No further comment's

2.4 To reduce emissions in line with my commitment, my company has a climate action plan and is taking action*

No

Own Emissions *

Energy consumption

3.2 Total energy consumption*

91153 kWh

3.3 Total renewable energy consumption*

91153 kWh

Scope 1 emissions

3.4 Scope 1 emissions*

1.22 metric tons CO2e

Scope 2 emissions

3.5 Location-based Scope 2 emissions*

53.57 metric tons CO2e

3.6 Market-based Scope 2 emissions*

-

Scope 1 and 2 units confirmation*

I confirm that I have entered all Scope 1 and 2 emissions values in metric tons CO2e

3.7 Have you taken any actions to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the reporting period?*

Yes

3.7.1 What actions have you taken?*

Transport and logistics, Product/service design innovation

3.7.2 Describe your actions taken to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the reporting period*

Our scope 1 or 2 emissions will decrease compared to 2024 because we will use green energy certificates where CO2 emissions will be zero. In addition, we are working strategically with a colleague, which will allow us to consume much less energy. Besides we're innovating new hybride products (more plant based items).

3.8 Which tools or methods did you use to calculate your Scope 1 and 2 emissions?*

Small Business Carbon Calculator

3.8.1 Specify any additional details*

We have used SME Climate hub calculators. We have taken the data from our annual figures and it is 1:1 verifiable

Value Chain Emissions (optional)

Scope 3 emissions

4.1 Have you measured any of your scope 3 emissions?*

Yes

Supply chain related - upstream emissions

Customer related - downstream emissions

Scope 3 units confirmation*

I confirm that I have entered all Scope 3 emissions values in metric tons CO2e

4.2 Have you taken any actions to reduce scope 3 emissions in the reporting period?*

Yes

4.2.1 What actions have you taken to reduce scope 3 emissions in the reporting period?*

Climate strategy and planning

4.2.2 Provide any additional details*

-

4.3 Have you asked any of your suppliers to set a net zero target (either voluntarily or as a requirement)?*

No

4.3.1 What percentage of your suppliers have you asked?*

-

4.4 Have you communicated your commitment and actions to any of your customers?*

Yes

4.5 Which tools or methods did you use to calculate your scope 3 emissions?*

Small Business Carbon Calculator

4.5.1 Specify additional details*

By using the integrated calculationtool in this SME Climate portal; we've used the financial data of our annual businessreport BJ2025

Results, Challenges and Outlook *

7.1 Provide any additional comments or context on your annual results and progress from previous years.*

Positively critically constructive we are convinced that literally every legal entity (= company and person) simply causes emissions by \\\"its own right to exist\\\" and is therefore by definition polluting / burdening the environment. Think for example of consumption, transport, energy consumption, (business) travel etc. This right to exist causes EMISSIONS. The terms emissions and CO2 neutrality should certainly NOT be confused with each other because CO2 is part of emissions apart from methane, nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxides, particulate matter etc. Greenwashing is then lurking and can for example be harmful to e.g. company image. For example: focus on driving around with electric trucks or bicycles is nice ... but how are these cars / bicycles actually built and what else does the company / person in question do based on minimizing their emissions? Shooting Kate Perry into the air for 10 minutes of weightlessness doesn\'t exactly help either, does it? In short, what does the legal entity in question focus on? (In)direct emissions / impact on the environment is really a given based on the right to exist. In our opinion, it is mainly about finding a good balance between limiting emissions and the STRIVE to be almost CO2 neutral. This ambition can be achieved by reducing own emissions (including the use of sustainable energy, cooperation with competitors, combined transport, less travel, etc.), compensation (= green energy certificates) and/or transparency and control. Take retail as an example: how can a large internationally operating company with the core business of selling groceries to consumers worldwide be CO2 neutral? Think of Walmart, Ahold, etc. Delivering 1:1 to homes, attracting consumers to the shops, suppliers, etc. etc. How does this compare to 1 local supplier who does NOT deliver worldwide? By the way, one company cannot exist without the other company because consumption will always be there. Relativity principle: the larger the company, the more complex the chains, the greater the absolute emissions (CO2 is part of this). For a larger company, it is easier to focus on green initiatives. But that does not mean that larger companies are less polluting than smaller companies. But this image is slowly starting to emerge incorrectly. After all, both companies exist and, as previously indicated, the fact of existence is by definition a burden on the environment. In short, the aim of achieving the lowest possible environmental impact (= reduction of CO2) is by definition good; but zero emissions are by definition not credible. And, last but not least, do not forget: CO2 neutral is certainly not the same as being climate neutral. So, in this case, please always be critical towards international, large company’s => think global, act local!

7.2 Do you face any key challenges in reducing emissions?*

Reducing scope 1+2 emissions

Specify other challenges*

-

7.3 Has there been any third party validation of the data submitted in this report?*

Yes

Scholt Energy

Vocking BV's Climate Report

Vocking BV's Climate Report - 2025

Introduction *

1.1 End day of the reporting period*

2025-12-31

1.1.1 Reporting year*

2025

1.2 Describe your business activities*

We have been producing Vocking liver sausage according to a traditional family recipe since 1891. Sales channels are retail, catering and wholesalers. We also produce (liver) sausage varieties under private label.

1.4 Number of employees on the end day of the reporting period*

4

1.4.1 Full-time equivalent (FTE) or headcounts*

Full-time equivalent

1.5 Is this report being submitted on behalf of a parent company or a subsidiary? If so, please briefly explain the relationship.*

Parent company

1.5.1 Please explain the relationship*

-

Commitment and Targets *

2.1 Net zero target year*

2045

2.1.1 Base year*

2024

2.1.2 Base year value*

41228

Base year value confirmation*

I confirm that I have entered my base year value in metric tons CO2e

2.2 Near-term target*

5% of intensity scope 1+2+3 emission reduction from my base year by 2026

2.3 Provide any additional comments or context on your net zero and near term targets.*

No further comment's

2.4 To reduce emissions in line with my commitment, my company has a climate action plan and is taking action*

No

Own Emissions *

Energy consumption

3.2 Total energy consumption*

91153 kWh

3.3 Total renewable energy consumption*

91153 kWh

Scope 1 emissions

3.4 Scope 1 emissions*

1.22 metric tons CO2e

Scope 2 emissions

3.5 Location-based Scope 2 emissions*

53.57 metric tons CO2e

3.6 Market-based Scope 2 emissions*

-

Scope 1 and 2 units confirmation*

I confirm that I have entered all Scope 1 and 2 emissions values in metric tons CO2e

3.7 Have you taken any actions to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the reporting period?*

Yes

3.7.1 What actions have you taken?*

Transport and logistics, Product/service design innovation

3.7.2 Describe your actions taken to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions in the reporting period*

Our scope 1 or 2 emissions will decrease compared to 2024 because we will use green energy certificates where CO2 emissions will be zero. In addition, we are working strategically with a colleague, which will allow us to consume much less energy. Besides we're innovating new hybride products (more plant based items).

3.8 Which tools or methods did you use to calculate your Scope 1 and 2 emissions?*

Small Business Carbon Calculator

3.8.1 Specify any additional details*

We have used SME Climate hub calculators. We have taken the data from our annual figures and it is 1:1 verifiable

Value Chain Emissions (optional) *

Scope 3 emissions

4.1 Have you measured any of your scope 3 emissions?*

Yes

Supply chain related - upstream emissions

Customer related - downstream emissions

Scope 3 units confirmation*

I confirm that I have entered all Scope 3 emissions values in metric tons CO2e

4.2 Have you taken any actions to reduce scope 3 emissions in the reporting period?*

Yes

4.2.1 What actions have you taken to reduce scope 3 emissions in the reporting period?*

Climate strategy and planning

4.2.2 Provide any additional details*

-

4.3 Have you asked any of your suppliers to set a net zero target (either voluntarily or as a requirement)?*

No

4.3.1 What percentage of your suppliers have you asked?*

-

4.4 Have you communicated your commitment and actions to any of your customers?*

Yes

4.5 Which tools or methods did you use to calculate your scope 3 emissions?*

Small Business Carbon Calculator

4.5.1 Specify additional details*

By using the integrated calculationtool in this SME Climate portal; we've used the financial data of our annual businessreport BJ2025

Results, Challenges and Outlook *

7.1 Provide any additional comments or context on your annual results and progress from previous years.*

Positively critically constructive we are convinced that literally every legal entity (= company and person) simply causes emissions by \\\"its own right to exist\\\" and is therefore by definition polluting / burdening the environment. Think for example of consumption, transport, energy consumption, (business) travel etc. This right to exist causes EMISSIONS. The terms emissions and CO2 neutrality should certainly NOT be confused with each other because CO2 is part of emissions apart from methane, nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxides, particulate matter etc. Greenwashing is then lurking and can for example be harmful to e.g. company image. For example: focus on driving around with electric trucks or bicycles is nice ... but how are these cars / bicycles actually built and what else does the company / person in question do based on minimizing their emissions? Shooting Kate Perry into the air for 10 minutes of weightlessness doesn\'t exactly help either, does it? In short, what does the legal entity in question focus on? (In)direct emissions / impact on the environment is really a given based on the right to exist. In our opinion, it is mainly about finding a good balance between limiting emissions and the STRIVE to be almost CO2 neutral. This ambition can be achieved by reducing own emissions (including the use of sustainable energy, cooperation with competitors, combined transport, less travel, etc.), compensation (= green energy certificates) and/or transparency and control. Take retail as an example: how can a large internationally operating company with the core business of selling groceries to consumers worldwide be CO2 neutral? Think of Walmart, Ahold, etc. Delivering 1:1 to homes, attracting consumers to the shops, suppliers, etc. etc. How does this compare to 1 local supplier who does NOT deliver worldwide? By the way, one company cannot exist without the other company because consumption will always be there. Relativity principle: the larger the company, the more complex the chains, the greater the absolute emissions (CO2 is part of this). For a larger company, it is easier to focus on green initiatives. But that does not mean that larger companies are less polluting than smaller companies. But this image is slowly starting to emerge incorrectly. After all, both companies exist and, as previously indicated, the fact of existence is by definition a burden on the environment. In short, the aim of achieving the lowest possible environmental impact (= reduction of CO2) is by definition good; but zero emissions are by definition not credible. And, last but not least, do not forget: CO2 neutral is certainly not the same as being climate neutral. So, in this case, please always be critical towards international, large company’s => think global, act local!

7.2 Do you face any key challenges in reducing emissions?*

Reducing scope 1+2 emissions

Specify other challenges*

-

7.3 Has there been any third party validation of the data submitted in this report?*

Yes

Scholt Energy

Generating a PDF file. Please wait....